Of all the blogs that I
have read, they have left me really thinking about the ownership of Wikipedia's
community created information. Seriously, who would want to claim to own public
information on Susan
Boyle or official knowledge and backup proof on dying
of laughter, written in a highly researched manner. Much like the
reading about the use (or lack of use) of cognitive surplus, I think
that as people of relatively intelligent social media skills, we all have the
ability to claim ownership to the content of Wikipedia, only if we have made a
sizable contribution to it. I wouldn't claim to have taken part in it because I
haven't even thought about ever editing a page. But how are we supposed to know
if the people who are in charge of the page are accepting the correct
information to have on the Wikipedia page? I'm making myself more curious on
that matter now. How would we know if they are just re paraphrasing what so
many other Google-searched sites are saying about a certain topic?
All three of my
classmates mentioned the credibility of a Wikipedia post in the eyes of a
school system. These can easily be argued, but we as society (or the teachers
who say Wikipedia isn't allowed) are not thinking logically in the sense that
the information presented to us has to come from somewhere. Most of this
information is listed in the footnotes as references anyway!
I was curious about how
the legitimacy of Wikipedia information was and of the once rising
star, Susan Boyle. As just, I simply popped in a Wikipedia search and was
presented with nearly every fact that I care to know, or for the most part,
overly care as well. Going through ridiculous information on this homebody who
had her 20 minutes of minimal fame, I recalled all the times when I had watched
her on Youtube and Facebook. I confidently announce that my dad and I both
enjoyed listening to her debut album, "I Dreamed A Dream" over and
over again. With so many dreams of dreams, I was too distracted to realize that
Susan Boyle is still going strong and has 6 albums, if not most all of which
are relatively inconspicuous to the public.
Nonetheless, I have no doubt that her Wikipedia page was bursting at the clicks with self-proclaimed knowledge of the woman. The most important piece of information Wikipedia provided me with was Susan's birthday. Without it, I would have never created the harebrained assumption that my dad and Susan are possibly long, lost fraternal twins separated at birth. For all we know, accents are just a ploy and Wikipedia is secretly trying to take over the world, one talented Brit at a time.
Works Cited
Gatto, Katie. "What's Mine Is Yours." K., 2 Sept. 2016,
annkgatto.wordpress.com/2016/09/02/whats-mine-is-yours/. Accessed 12 Sept.
2016.
Hargers, Dantrel. "Let's talk about Wikipedia." Daaaaamn Danny, 9 Sept. 2016,
damndanny.blogspot.com/. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
"Susan Boyle." Wikipedia.
Wikipedia,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Boyle. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
"Susan Boyle - Britains Got Talent 2009 Episode 1 - Saturday
11th April." YouTube, uploaded
by UKAdvertChannel, 11 Apr. 2009, www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxPZh4AnWyk. Accessed
12 Sept. 2016.
Tingle, Jake. "WikiFeedia." Social Media and Society, 2 Sept. 2016,
scartingle.wordpress.com/2016/09/02/wikifeedia/. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment